Close
Cookies warning
This web site uses cookies to improve your experience. By viewing our content, you are accepting the use of cookies.
Cookies are small text documents stored on your computer; the cookies set by this website can only be used on this website and pose no security risk.
Please do not proceed if you do not want these cookies being set. [Show details][Hide details]
| Cookie Name | Cookie Description | When not logged in | When logged in |
|---|
| __utma | This is set by Google Analytics. It stores each user's amount of visits, and the time of the first visit, the previous visit, and the current visit. | Yes | Yes |
| __utmb, __utmc | These are set by Google Analytics. They are used to check approximately how long you stay on a site (when a visit starts, and approximately ends). | Yes | Yes |
| __utmz | This is set by Google Analytics. It stores where a visitor came from (search engine, search keyword, link). | Yes | Yes |
| PHPSESSID | The ID of your session. | Yes | Yes |
| prima_web_notice | Remembers if you have alreaded viewed any notice/warning message(s). Such a message is used to inform users of potential downtime or issues that might affect the normal operation of the website. It is set to expire after the date when such notice is obsolete (eg after an expected downtime/error is fixed). | Yes | Yes |
| prima_web_cookies | Remembers whether you have already closed this message. | Yes | Yes |
|
 |
Further DetailsICDAR2005 Page Segmentation Competition A. Antonacopoulos, B. Gatos, D. Bridson Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition (ICDAR2005), Seoul, South Korea, August/September 2005, pp. 75-79
AbstractThere is an established need for objective evaluation of layout analysis methods, in realistic circumstances. This paper describes the Page Segmentation Competition (modus operandi, dataset and evaluation criteria) held in the context of ICDAR2005 and presents the results of the evaluation of four candidate methods. The main objective of the competition was to compare the performance of such methods using scanned documents from commonly-occurring publications. The results indicate that although methods seem to be maturing, there is still a considerable need to develop robust methods that deal with everyday documents. Full Paper Download
back
|
